Hippie Home Abortion

Comments

How to become a baby killer in 3 easy steps!
Someone sure isn't ignorant.
No, someone IS ignornant....1 2 3 NOT IT.
I'm not the one spreading biased propaganda in my blog, thanks.
Facts supported by research and medical truth is not propaganda. 3 women suing abortion providers for failing to disclose to them the risk of breast cancer and emotional distress from their abortions and winning isn't propaganda. I suggest you read up on your facts about abortion. FACTS.
Everything and anything has been found to cause cancer. I know my facts, thanks. Please stop posting your horse shit.
What a convenient way to sweep something under the rug...this will be my last post so bear with me. You seem to think that I hold my views on abortion the way I do because I am part of some big conspiracy to hurt women, deny them of rights. Not true!! Some of my best friends are "pro-choice". I have done extensive research into the subject, as you claim you have, also. I think it is a GREAT injustice to deny women the findings of these medical studies. If you're going to keep abortion legal, FINE. Wouldn't you want to be aware of the risks associated with ANY medical procedure you have? Wouldn't you like to make an informed decision based on all current knowledge there is available to you? Fact: Abortion has been medically proven on more than 8 studies to be an actual cause of breast cancer.
Fact: Abortion can cause sterility, infection and even death. (and it happens more than you think)
Fact: For some people abortion can be mentally distressing and often can lead to depression (it doesn't matter if it was because the woman didn't make the right decision for herself, it doesn't matter if she later regrets her decision because she feels she was forced into the abortion, it is a fact)
Fact: Most women are not aware of how advanced the "unborn baby" (as I will call it because that is my opinion and how I look at it) is when they attain their abortion and when they later find out are shocked. A lot of women say they may have not gone through with the abortion if they knew the development of the unborn baby at the stage of pregnancy they were in when attaining the abortion.
Fact: Abortion clinics are coming under close scrutiny and some have been shut down for providing abortions that were not lawful. For hiding the fact that the "child" (under the age of 18) was indeed pregnant by statutory rape (they are required to report this).
Opinion: Abortion hurts women. This is the opinion I have come to. I think any medical procedure that denies women the whole truth before making the decision on the procedure HURTS the woman ultimately.
Opinion: Abortion hurts children. Abortion is the catalyst for how we look at our children. Yes, the unborn baby is dependent upon its mothers body for care and nourishment before it is born, but is it not also dependent on its care and nourishment AFTER it is born. A newborn baby cannot feed itself, dress itself, diaper itself. Abortion isn't about a right to your body as so many women say. It is about the resulting baby that comes after. So, may I ask, would you think it was wrong for a mother to "abort" her 1 week old infant? Would you think it was wrong for a mother to abort her 38 week gestation unborn baby? The difference is merely weeks, but the difference is also huge. One is legal and the other is not. So, in my opinion, abortion degrades the value we place on our children, our future.
Opinion: Abortion is a lie, told to women, to make them think that they are too weak to achieve great things while also being a mother. Anyone who tells me that abortion is a better decision for my body, my child, than parenting or adoption is saying to me that I am not strong enough to handle any of that. Abortion is, in fact, anti-feminism.

As a society, our rights only go so far. When our "rights" impose on the rights of another person, the line is drawn. In the case of Abortion, the unborn baby is not viewed as a person and I've never understood this. The unborn child has a separate DNA from that of its mother and it is indeed HUMAN DNA. Why wouldn't this be recognized as a person? Certainly it is. I know why the abortion rights activists lobby against laws that protect an unborn baby from an outside offender. Once those laws are in place it means that the unborn child is recognized as a person, as it should be, and a whole other world opens up. The argument being: How can the same "fetus" be recognized and protected by the law from outside violence, but not be recognized by the law in the case of abortion. Is it ok for the mother to commit an act of violence against her unborn baby by "choice" but not for someone else to? In other words, its ok for ME to kill my unborn child, but no one else. Its not even okay for me to harm my unborn child if I intend on carrying on the pregnancy (eg. drugs, alcohol) but it IS okay for me to terminate the life of that same child. It doesn't make sense. It is hypocritically flawed. Do you understand where I'm going with any of this? I don't understand how something can be a law when there are so many flaws in it. I am for overturning Roe Vs. Wade and leaving it up to the states again. I think the judicial system needs to hear the case again. They need to open it up. Especially since the last time they heard the case was in the 70's and the medical info we had on the unborn back then was next to nothing. The medical advances we have made since then should REQUIRE them to at least examine the evidence. Do you really like a law that is archaic? This will be my last post. Thanks for engaging me in a debate.
"Opinion: Abortion is a lie, told to women, to make them think that they are too weak to achieve great things while also being a mother. Anyone who tells me that abortion is a better decision for my body, my child, than parenting or adoption is saying to me that I am not strong enough to handle any of that. Abortion is, in fact, anti-feminism."

I find this both offensive and interesting and it pretty much seals the fact for me that you have no idea what you're talking about and have no idea what feminism is, or understand the aptitude that comes with becoming a mother or getting an abortion. I am going through the process right now of getting an abortion. You're telling me that I've been brainwashed to think I'm weak? I find this in and of itself to be a very anti-feminist statement. Not everyone who gets pregnant wants to be a mother. I certainly don't, at least not when I'm 18 years old and live in a college dormitory.

Further, I think that your "facts" need to be checked by the fact that when women don't have safe and legal access to abortion, they will find other ways. I can't believe you're arguing the health of a woman as a point to criminalizing abortion but failing to recognize the fact that women will tear out their own uteruses trying to prevent pregnancy -- that's not very healthy, now, is it? Oh no, three women are pissed because they weren't informed about a statistic virtually no one with a medical degree takes seriously? You've got to be kidding. You're ignorant if you don't recognize that for hundreds of years, women have died trying to terminate their own pregnancies. The availability and knowledge of procedures like the one in my blog entry should be evidence enough to you that making abortion illegal will not prevent them from happening. Women who don't want to be pregnant are not concerned with the law. They're concerned with getting what is essentially a parasite out of their bodies by any means possible. An analogy can be seen with the War on Drugs -- drugs are illegal. People who want them still get them easily and without much concern for the law, and this in and of itself is often dangerous -- if not just for the propagation organized crime, for the unsanitary manufacturing of these drugs. Drug laws do not prevent drug use from happening, they just create an unregulated market.

I dare you to try to find a woman who has had an abortion who thinks that they're too "weak" to carry out a pregnancy. I find it disgusting that I would have to justify my abortion to anyone. Maybe this is why you think women who undergo the procedures are "weak" -- they have to take time out of their lives to explain to you why, on earth, could they possibly want to kill a baby? I just don't want one. And maybe I don't know why. I don't really care. All I know is that within the next couple weeks, I'm getting something sucked out of me, and it's no one's business but my own.

Real feminism is all about a woman's choice in every aspect of her life: her career, her religion, her martial choices. Real feminism is all about removing woman from the role of a mother. Pro-life "feminism" directly contradicts this. Anyone who considers themselves a ""pro-life feminist" is incredibly disillusioned. You need to take a look at the real world.


By the way, your "facts?" All myths. I can read pro-life propaganda, too!
[this is good]
Thank you for posting things like this. I know that killing a baby isn't good at all. But worse than doing an abortion is to wait for the kid to born and make this kid pay for your mistake. Living a life that he/she doesn't deserve is just unforgivable. If someone feels that it is not the right time for being a mother, the right thing to do is to avoid pregnancy and if any accidents happen, do an abortion the earliest she can. It's WAY more cruel to make a kid live a terrible life with an irresponsible/careless mother than doing abortion. By posting things like this you may help young silly girls that have unprotected sex and end up pregnant. If they're not responsible enough to protect themselves, how could they take the responsibility to take care of a child? That kind of people will look for any ways to get rid of the baby. And if they use a natural and harmless way like yours, it's more easy for them to survive.
Thanks for the comment. I agree completely. However, I just want to make it perfectly clear that I haven't tried this method and don't know if it's 100% safe. I think the surgical procedure in the first trimester is the best and safest option. However, I think that it is interesting that a much cheaper alternative method that can be done in the privacy of your own home not only exists but has been able to reach thousands by way of the internet.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in